Categories: Policy

Modern Signage and Adaptive Reuse: What Works and What Doesn’t

When planning an adaptive reuse development, signage is not typically something that garners a lot of consideration – but the failure to do it right can negatively affect an otherwise great project.

Commercial signage has evolved quite a bit over the years, particularly with the addition of LED-powered signs and the gradual shift to suburban-style construction – including signage – in urban settings. But when it comes to historic properties, modern sensibilities are rarely the answer.

Take, for example, Pratt Street Power Plant in Baltimore – which we’ve written about here previously. While the project was a catalytic mixed-use development that helped re-energize the city’s Inner Harbor, the building’s historic façade is plastered with no less than a half-dozen prominent, brightly-lit LED commercial signs.

There’s nothing inherently wrong with adding modern signage to a historic building, nor with using LED signs for that purpose. But when they’re so prominent, and there’s so many of them, it begins to distract from what should be visual priority number one: the historic structure itself.

Ideally, modern signage added to historic structures should fit the building’s existing aesthetic, rather than trying to overrun it with modern flourishes. Subtlety over flashiness is the key.

It is, of course, a difficult balance to strike. The mission of making signage a secondary visual priority directly conflicts with most corporate branding strategies, which call for branding to be front-and-center wherever possible.

Many municipalities already have regulations in place to ensure that signage on adaptive reuse projects fit with their historic structures. In San Antonio, for example, historic preservation guidelines specify that signage should “complement, rather than compete with, the character of a historic building and the surrounding district,” and also bans pole signs, digital LED display signs, roof-mounted signs, and “suburban-style” monument signage. Similarly, municipal code in Long Beach, CA, suggests that signs for adaptive reuse projects should be “compatible with the architecture of the original building.”

Ultimately, the best way to prevent tacky modern signage being added to historic structures is through such regulations. Their presence – and enforcement – may be the difference between a community maintaining its historic character, or having it squandered by overzealous branding.

Adapt + Reuse

Adapt + Reuse is an online publication dedicated to highlighting and honoring adaptive reuse and historic preservation projects across the U.S.

Share
Published by
Adapt + Reuse

Recent Posts

Downtown Atlanta’s Residence Inn First Housed Rhodes-Haverty Investment Firm

Though it has been known as the Downtown Atlanta Residence Inn for over two decades,…

4 years ago

The Pegasus in Downtown L.A. Originally Housed Mobil Oil Offices

Located in the heart of Los Angeles’ central business district, the Pegasus apartment building at…

4 years ago

Two Marriott Hotels Occupy Former Milwaukee Road Complex in Minneapolis

While the days of major railroad activity in Minneapolis have long passed, there remains one…

4 years ago

Former Kress Building in Savannah Now Houses The Gap, Condos, and Basement Tapas Bar

Savannah, GA, is home to one of the largest and most impressively preserved historic districts…

4 years ago

Foshay Tower in Minneapolis Was Reimagined as a W Hotel

Next time you visit Minneapolis, you can stay a night in the historic Foshay Tower…

4 years ago

Midtown Exchange Reimagines the Minneapolis Sears, Roebuck, & Co. Building

There’s something about old Sears buildings that makes them perfect for large-scale adaptive reuse projects.…

4 years ago